{"id":1622,"date":"2026-07-02T06:15:18","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T06:15:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/?p=1622"},"modified":"2026-07-02T06:21:20","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T06:21:20","slug":"libro-prosperity-liberty-what-venezuela-needs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/2026\/07\/02\/libro-prosperity-liberty-what-venezuela-needs\/","title":{"rendered":"Book review: “Prosperity & Liberty: What Venezuela Needs\u2026”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Gordon, D. (2019). Review of Prosperity & Liberty: What Venezuela Needs…<\/em>, por Acevedo, R. (Ed.). Estudios Libertarios<\/em>, 2, 105-107.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

DAVID GORDON*<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
Save as PDF<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Rafael Acevedo is a distinguished Venezuelan economist, now in part time residence at Texas Tech University, who is deeply concerned about the future of his native country. Socialism has brought Venezuela to rack and ruin, and if the country is to recover, a move to the free market is essential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many have said the same thing, but Acevedo has done much more than bemoan his country\u2019s fate and point to the obvious remedy. He is the head of a think tank call Econintech, and he and his collaborators have proposed detailed plans for the reconstruction of Venezuela from its present state of wreckage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Prosperity & Liberty<\/em>, Acevedo has gathered together a number of these plans, as well as essays by eminent scholars who tell Venezuela\u2019s sad tale and compare the situation of that country with what has taken place elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A vital point made in the book is that Venezuela\u2019s descent into disaster did not begin with the overtly socialist regime of Hugo Ch\u00e1vez. To the contrary, the relatively free economy that had existed before 1958, albeit under a political dictatorship, was gradually supplanted by interventionist policies that brought with them massive corruption and a decline in economic growth. Though Venezuela is blessed with immense natural resources, oil deposits foremost among them, these did not suffice to fend off disaster.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given the economy\u2019s poor performance, what was to be done? One might think the answer obvious, a return to a freer economy, but unfortunately another path gained popularity. Advocates of this path said that Venezuela\u2019s economic problems resulted not from too much socialism, but rather from too little of it. As Acevedo and Luis Cirocco note in an illuminating essay, \u201cOver time, the gradual destruction of economic freedom led to more and more impoverishment and crisis. This, in turn, set the stage for the rise of a political outsider with a populist message: Hugo Ch\u00e1vez. He was elected in 1998 and promised to replace our \u2018lighter\u2019 socialism by a form of hard socialism, which he called \u2018the revolution of the 21st century\u2019 and which only magnified the problems we had faced for decades. He was able to pass an even more anti-private property constitution. Since Ch\u00e1vez\u2019s death in 2013, the attacks against private property continued, and Ch\u00e1vez\u2019s successor, Nicol\u00e1s Maduro, keeps promising more of the same. The government has turned toward outright authoritarian socialism. . .\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Students of Austrian economics will not be surprised that the socialist program has failed completely. The most overt sign of economic chaos is the country\u2019s extraordinary inflation rate. Essential consumer goods are at best in short supply, and the entrepreneurial spirit, a key to economic growth, has been stifled. Small wonder that many have fled the country, and many among those who remain cross the border to engage in black market exchanges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The disaster that has resulted from socialism is by no means confined to the economic sphere. Those who openly challenge the regime have been arrested and sometimes tortured as well, and again this should come as no surprise. As Friedrich Hayek long ago taught us, \u201ca competitive capitalist economy is necessary to sustain democracy, and that once a country becomes \u2018dominated by a collectivist creed, democracy will inevitably destroy itself.\u2019 The reason is simple.  Centrally planned, socialist economic systems necessarily concentrate economic power in the hands of government planners who can, through their economic edicts, punish dissent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If Hayek accurately depicted the road to serfdom, our pressing question becomes, what is the road to freedom? The answer does not lie in the deposition of Maduro and his replacement by his rival Juan Guaid\u00f3. He is, sad to say, also a socialist, though not so extreme a one as Maduro, and his program would not rescue Venezuela from the economic doldrums. I should add, though the contributors to the volume do not state this directly, that it would a path of folly to install Guaid\u00f3 by force, a course of action urged by many American neoconservatives, ever eager to mind the business of other countries. Political and economic salvation for Venezuela can come only from the Venezuelan people themselves. They cannot be \u201cforced to be free\u201d but must seek, if they have the wit and wisdom to do so, the guidance of experienced free market economists like Acevedo and his coworkers at Econintech.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is the best way to establish a free market economy? Acevedo with penetrating insight accepts the counsel of the greatest Austrian economist of the latter half of the twentieth century, Murray Rothbard. Economic reform must be extensive and fast, not creeping and piecemeal: \u201cFreeing only a few areas at a time, \u201cRothbard said, \u201cwill only impose continuous distortions that will cripple the workings of the market and discredit it in the eyes of an already fearful and suspicious public.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is heartening that Acevedo and his colleagues have learned so much from the Austrian School, and he and his colleagues have made abundantly clear the best course of action for Venezuela. It is a course of action that only the Venezuelan people themselves can take.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

*<\/a> David Gordon is a senior fellow at the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He was educated at UCLA, where he earned a PhD in intellectual history. He is the author of Resurrecting Marx: The Analytical Marxists on Exploitation, Freedom, and Justice<\/em>, The Philosophical Origins of Austrian Economics<\/em>, An Introduction to Economic Reasoning<\/em>, and Critics of Marx<\/em>. He is also editor of Secession, State, and Liberty<\/em> and co-editor of H.B. Acton’s Morals of Markets and Other Essays<\/em>. Dr. Gordon is the editor of The Mises Review<\/em><\/a>, and a contributor to such journals as analysis<\/em>, The International Philosophic Quarterly<\/em>, The Journal of Libertarian Studies<\/em>, and The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics<\/em>. E-mail:<\/strong> dgordon@mises.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gordon, D. (2019). Review of Prosperity & Liberty: What Venezuela Needs…, por Acevedo, R. (Ed.). Estudios Libertarios, 2, 105-107. DAVID GORDON* Rafael Acevedo is a distinguished Venezuelan economist, now in part time residence at Texas Tech University, who is deeply concerned about the future of his native country. Socialism has brought Venezuela to rack and… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"3.0.2","language":"en","enabled_languages":["es","en"],"languages":{"es":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"en":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false}}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1622"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1632,"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1622\/revisions\/1632"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/estudioslibertarios.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}